Case Summary
Muhammed Ashraf is the petitioner and the defendant while Ashraf and Sikkanthar are the respondents. The case involves a petition which has been allowed after hearing both parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed and costs were paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, IA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ashraf
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.M.Musthafa
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.M.Muhammed Iqubal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Smt.CV.Noorjahan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rajith Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
IA allowed
Evidence:
Hence, IA allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2022