Case Summary
This case involves K Surendran and M/s.Nirmal Associates. The petitioner failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the petition for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's lack of representation and no steps taken.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner failed to appear in court.
Petitioner failed to appear in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner failed to appear in court.
Petitioner failed to appear in court.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner has no representation. No steps taken.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K Surendran
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s.Nirmal Associates
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Jineesh Lal.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ahammed kutty Puthalath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Shamsudheen Puthalath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Rimna.V
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed for default due to no representation and no steps taken.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K Surendran vs M/s.Nirmal Associates regarding petition dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between K Surendran vs M/s.Nirmal Associates regarding petition dismissal for default.