Case Summary
The case involves M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank as the petitioner and M/s. Hi-tech Steel Industries as the respondent. The execution petition was heard and the decree holder decided not to press the execution.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was closed as not pressed by the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
Decree holder did not press the execution petition.
Decree holder did not press the execution petition.
Why Defendant Won:
Decree holder did not press the execution petition.
Decree holder did not press the execution petition.
Supporting Evidence
The decree holder not pressed the EP.
Judgment Evidence:
EP closed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Hi-tech Steel Industries
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Hareendranath.C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Shaji.M.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Decree holder not pressed the EP.
Evidence:
EP closed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2022