Case Summary
This case involves M/s Vismayas Max Animation Academy as the plaintiff and Ashik Rasaq as the defendant. The court concluded that the plaint was rejected due to the absence of remitted court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the lack of remitted court fees. The case did not proceed further.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
Supporting Evidence
The court concluded that no balance court fee was remitted and no application was filed, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Vismayas Max Animation Academy
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashik Rasaq
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.Chandra Sekharan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Raju George
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.N. Gopalakrishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Udaya Kumar.M.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Evidence:
plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023