Case Summary
M/s Union Bank of India filed a suit against Ajilal. U. regarding balance court fee and pre-trial steps. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's repeated absence and failure to remit the required balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee despite having multiple opportunities.
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee despite having multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee despite having multiple opportunities.
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee despite having multiple opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
It is noted that repeated opportunities granted. Even then the BCF is not remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Union Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajilal. U.
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G.K. Pradeep Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bichu. A. pradeep
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Union Bank of India vs Ajilal. U. regarding court fee and trial matters
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Union Bank of India vs Ajilal. U. regarding court fee and trial matters