Case Summary
M/S Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd filed a suit against Sajayan and Sumesh. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and the non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 R11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/S Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajayan
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sumesh
- Party Age
- 45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Smt. Jayarekha.G.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to absence and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 R11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/S Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Sajayan, Sumesh regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between M/S Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Sajayan, Sumesh regarding plaint rejection