OS. No.766/2020

Case between M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Dinesh Kumar et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court

COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S

Order Date

2025-07-16

Duration

approximately-5 years 6 months

Case Closed

Wed, 07/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. filed a suit against Dinesh Kumar and others. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present to adduce evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The case was dismissed as the plaintiff did not present evidence. The judgment was pronounced in open court.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to present evidence to support their case.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to present evidence to support their case.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff not present before the court to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the plaintiff is not ready to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd.
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Dinesh Kumar
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Remya
Party Age: 33
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sandhya Rani
Party Age: 40
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Prasanna Kumar Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Smt. Renjini.N
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Rajasekharan Thampi P.S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not being ready to adduce evidence.

Evidence: