Case Summary
M/s. ICICI Bank Limited filed a suit against Sajith S and Valsala N. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed based on the memo filed by the plaintiff's counsel.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed by the court as not pressed, based on a memo filed by the plaintiff's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. ICICI Bank Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajith S
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Valsala N
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.A Girishkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri Ashok P Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N.S Panchu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Limited vs Sajith S et al regarding dismissal as not pressed
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Limited vs Sajith S et al regarding dismissal as not pressed