Case Summary
The case involved M/S HDFC bank and Anu S Lal. The suit was concerning a matter that was eventually settled, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed following a settlement between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
The matter was settled by the parties before the court.
The matter was settled by the parties before the court.
Why Defendant Won:
The matter was settled by the parties before the court.
The matter was settled by the parties before the court.
Supporting Evidence
Filed memo to not press the suit as matter settled.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/S HDFC bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anu S Lal
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Judit Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit stands dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Plaintiff represented. Filed memo to not press the suit as matter settled. Hence suit stands dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/S HDFC bank vs Anu S Lal regarding settlement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between M/S HDFC bank vs Anu S Lal regarding settlement of suit
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement