Case Summary
M/s Chakrabarti Eye Care Centre, represented by Dr. Arup Chakrabarti, is suing Gopinathan.B for the repayment of an advance rent amounting to ₹50,000. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to refund the advance after vacating the rented premises in 2019.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by M/s Chakrabarti Eye Care Centre was dismissed by the court, finding that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence for its claims regarding the advance rent.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not provide credible evidence to support the claim for repayment of the advance amount.
The plaintiff did not provide credible evidence to support the claim for repayment of the advance amount.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not provide credible evidence to support the claim for repayment of the advance amount.
The plaintiff did not provide credible evidence to support the claim for repayment of the advance amount.
Supporting Evidence
Upon considering the evidence before this Court, it is found that the plaintiff is not entitled to a decree in its favour.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result: The suit is dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Chakrabarti Eye Care Centre
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopinathan.B
- Party Age
- 54
Plaintiffs Documents
Acknowledgment receipt, Receipt
Defendants Documents
Rent Agreement
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G. Anil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Thomas Skariah
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff requested the return of the advance amount.
Evidence:
This court is of the view that the plaintiff is not entitled to get the relief as prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced by the plaintiff to support the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Introduced by the plaintiff but not clearly tied to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Rent Agreement
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Essential for understanding the rental terms and obligations.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt