Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R C P No.23/2023

Case between Mr.Sasilal.P vs Mr.Anil Kumar et al regarding rent control

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Anjali. P
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
approximately-10 years 0 days
Case Closed
Mon, 07/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. Sasilal.P is the petitioner seeking resolution in a rent control matter against Mr. Anil Kumar and Vimmy. E. The case was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's unpreparedness for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner was not ready for evidence, despite the respondent's readiness.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner was not ready for evidence, despite the respondent's readiness.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner was dismissed for default due to unpreparedness.
Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner was dismissed for default due to unpreparedness.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner not ready for evidence today.

Judgment Evidence:

The case has listed for evidence on 10/07/2025. Respondent is present and ready today as well, since the petitioner is not ready, RCP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr.Sasilal.P
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o Late Pattayil Raghavan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Anil Kumar
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o Raghavan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vimmy. E
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o Anil Kumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Anoop.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnu Yuvaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.A.K.Sukuman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reena Sukumaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petitioner not ready for evidence today.
Evidence:
since the petitioner is not ready, RCP is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr.Sasilal.P vs Mr.Anil Kumar et al regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Mr.Sasilal.P vs Mr.Anil Kumar et al regarding rent control

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 07/14/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mundoli Abdurasak vs K.P. Assan Koya et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court/Principal Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mattummal Muhammed Hashim vs Safar Ahammed regarding rent control petition
Rent Control Court/Principal Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kedanhoth Mahmood vs K.S.Siyad et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.K. Nazim vs E.K. Nirmalakumari et al regarding Rent Control
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Ramadasan et al vs Ameena Mullaveettil regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court/Principal Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won