Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1214/2013

Case between Mr. Rajesh Babu vs M/s. Mulamootil Consumer Credits Limited et al regarding attachment of property.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
approximately-11 years 3 months 18 days
Case Code No.
1214
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. Rajesh Babu filed a petition to release the attachment on his property which was encumbered due to an earlier decree. The respondents did not appear in court despite being notified, leading to an ex-parte decision in favor of the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to release the attachment on the property. The petitioner was determined to be the rightful owner, and no execution petition had been filed by the decree holder.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The attachment over the petition schedule property is hereby released.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to release the attachment on the property. The petitioner was determined to be the rightful owner, and no execution petition had been filed by the decree holder.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim petitioner provided substantial evidence supporting his title and ownership of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim petitioner provided substantial evidence supporting his title and ownership of the property.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and evidence on record it is evident that the claim put forward by the claim petitioner is bona fide and the petition deserves to be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The petition is allowed and the attachment over the petition schedule property as per order in IA.5909/2013 in OS.No.1214/2013 dated 31/08/2013 is hereby released.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Rajesh Babu
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Mulamootil Consumer Credits Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ms. Remany
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vellathan
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ms. Sarojini
Party Age
90
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ms. Shyni.U
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of the Power of Attorney, Certified Copy of sale certificate, Certified Copy of order passed by Hon’ble Family Court, Kottarakkara
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Suresh Kumar.N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The attachment over the petition schedule property as per order in IA.5909/2013 in OS.No.1214/2013 dated 31/08/2013 is released.
Evidence:
In the result: The petition is allowed and the attachment over the petition schedule property as per order in IA.5909/2013 in OS.No.1214/2013 dated 31/08/2013 is hereby released.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original power of attorney was produced before the court.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certificate of Sale
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the certificate of sale which establishes the petitioner's lawful acquisition of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Order from Family Court
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the order passed by the Hon’ble Family Court recognizing the petitioner's rightful ownership and withdrawal of the attachment.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2013

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 12/11/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won