O.S 139/2018

Case between M.Hilal et al vs M.Nejumunnisa et al regarding restoration of suit

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA

Judge

Sri. ARAVIND. P

Order Date

2025-06-20

Duration

Case Code No.

139

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners M.Hilal and Roolia are seeking the restoration of a suit against the respondents M.Nejumunnisa and Muhammad Asharaf. The court allowed the petition after considering the materials presented.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

The petition is allowed. Suit is restored to file.

Case Type

Restoration Petition

Final Judgment

The court allowed the petition for restoration of the suit. No costs were awarded.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds to restore the suit based on the materials presented.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient grounds to restore the suit based on the materials presented.

Supporting Evidence

After considering the materials, this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the petition is allowed. Suit is restored to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M.Hilal
Party Age: 71
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Roolia
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M.Nejumunnisa
Party Age: 68

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muhammad Asharaf
Party Age: 68

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Madhusoodanan. L.R
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.P. Vijayakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The petition for restoration is allowed.

Evidence:

After considering the materials, this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed. Hence the petition is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification