O.S. No.1701/2022

Case between Meera P.S. vs Prasad et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court

COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I

Judge

Sri. Manesh. S.V

Order Date

2025-07-10

Duration

approximately-2 years 9 months

Case Closed

Thu, 07/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Meera P.S., is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who allegedly attempted to trespass and cut a drain through her property. The defendants failed to appear in court, leading to an ex parte proceeding.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted the plaintiff a permanent prohibitory injunction, preventing the defendants from trespassing on her property. The defendants were found to have no right to disturb the plaintiff's ownership and enjoyment of the property.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing and disturbing the plaintiff’s possession.

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her ownership and right to enjoy the property through unchallenged evidence.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

From the uncontroverted testimony of PW1 and Ext.A1 and A2, the plaintiff had established her case warranting the grant of reliefs sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed with costs as follows: The defendants and their agents are restrained by a decree of prohibitory injunction from trespassing and encroaching into the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Meera P.S.
Party Age: 49
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Prasad
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rajan
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rajeevan
Party Age: 26
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Baiju
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sulfeekar
Party Age: 28
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Certified Copy of Will deed No.III/32/02 of Thiruvallam SRO dated 27/05/2002, Property tax receipt dated 03/04/2025

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. R.S.Anoop Chandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing and disturbing the plaintiff's possession.

Evidence:

The defendants and their agents are restrained by a decree of prohibitory injunction from trespassing and encroaching into the plaint schedule property and committing waste therein and cutting open a new drain through the same and from disturbing the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment over the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Will Deed

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Establishes the plaintiff's ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property.

Reference:

Ext.A1

Document Type: Tax receipt