Case Summary
M.D Sukumaran filed a rent control petition against Mr. Gokul R. The petitioner expressed intent not to proceed with the petition, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition after the petitioner decided not to press the matter further.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.D Sukumaran
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Gokul R
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Court fee, Legal Benefit Fund, Vakalath fee, Document Fee, Process fee, Petition fee
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abhishek.R.V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is not intending the proceed with the petition. The submission of counsel is endorsed. Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.D Sukumaran vs Mr. Gokul R regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between M.D Sukumaran vs Mr. Gokul R regarding Rent Control Petition