Case Summary
Maya Trossy is the petitioner who filed a Rent Control Petition against Vinsal, the counter petitioner. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation, with no further time granted.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Maya Trossy
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinsal
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vamanapuram V. K. Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Petition kept aside. It is noted that repeated opportunities granted. Even then the plaintiff not turning up. So this court is of the view that no further time need be granted. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Maya Trossy vs Vinsal regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Maya Trossy vs Vinsal regarding Rent Control Petition