Case Summary
M. Mohammed Kunju and Jafeena.S filed a petition regarding the possession of a building against M/s.Electro Green Motors Pvt. Ltd and Anwar A.T. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous after the respondent handed over possession of the building.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent had already handed over possession of the building. Therefore, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Key Reasoning:
The possession of the building was already handed over to the petitioner.
The possession of the building was already handed over to the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
The possession of the building was already handed over to the petitioner.
The possession of the building was already handed over to the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
The possession of the building was already handed over to the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
As the respondent has already handed over possession of Petition Schedule Building to the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M. Mohammed Kunju
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jafeena.S
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s.Electro Green Motors Pvt. Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anwar A.T
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition for possession.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. S. Laila
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Renjith.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sandhya Rani.V.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Bijulal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Ajitha V.K. Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the respondent already handing over possession of the Petition Schedule Building to the petitioner.
Evidence:
As the respondent has already handed over possession of Petition Schedule Building to the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2023