Case Summary
Lathika Devi filed a suit against Sunitha but was absent during the hearing. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was not present or represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and unrepresented during the hearing.
Plaintiff was absent and unrepresented during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and unrepresented during the hearing.
Plaintiff was absent and unrepresented during the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lathika Devi
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunitha
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G.S Rajeev Chempakassery
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri K.G Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the Plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lathika Devi vs Sunitha regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Lathika Devi vs Sunitha regarding dismissal for default