Case Summary
Laila.S has filed a suit against Jacob Samson. The court has rejected the plaint due to the failure to remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint filed by Laila.S against Jacob Samson was rejected by the court due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee.
The plaint was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee.
The plaint was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
No Balance Court fee seen remitted till date. No application seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Laila.S
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o. late Sasikumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jacob Samson
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o. Sri. Samson Jacob
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Deepak J.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G. Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Dhanya U.D
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dougles Linsby
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N.R, Prasobh B. S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Laila.S vs Jacob Samson regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between Laila.S vs Jacob Samson regarding rejection of plaint