Case Summary
Laila. S.S is the plaintiff represented by an advocate, while Praveen pradyoth and others are the defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented. Therefore, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear and failed to provide evidence.
The plaintiff did not appear and failed to provide evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No evidence adduced.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Laila. S.S
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Praveen pradyoth
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C.S Sheeba
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.K Vijayakumar
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B. Vasudevan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri V.S Bhasurendran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Laila. S.S vs Praveen pradyoth et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Laila. S.S vs Praveen pradyoth et al regarding suit dismissal for default.