Case Summary
Kumudini Fletcher filed a Rent Control Petition against Pavanasam and Sreejith. The court dismissed the case as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court concluded that the petition was not pressed and dismissed it accordingly.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence RCP is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kumudini Fletcher
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pavanasam
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreejith
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not pressed memo
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.B. Vasudevan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C. Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence RCP is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RCP.NO.
Case Code Year
2022