Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1578/2013

Case between K.T. Kuruvila vs Chenchery Kurumkolam Residents Association et al regarding Advocate fee claim

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini. B
Order Date
2025-09-22
Duration
approximately-12 years 19 days
Case Closed
Mon, 09/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves K.T. Kuruvila as the plaintiff who claimed advocates fees against the Chenchery Kurumkolam Residents Association and its members. The petition was partly allowed, and certain fees were disallowed based on the rules.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court found that part of the advocate's fee claimed by the petitioner was valid and allowed corrections to be made. However, the total fee claimed exceeded the amount prescribed by the rules, leading to some disallowance.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Petition partly allowed to correct the memo regarding commissioner batta paid.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that part of the advocate's fee claimed by the petitioner was valid and allowed corrections to be made. However, the total fee claimed exceeded the amount prescribed by the rules, leading to some disallowance.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner had legitimate claims regarding the documentation presented, but the court was bound by the rules governing advocate fees.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner had legitimate claims regarding the documentation presented, but the court was bound by the rules governing advocate fees.
Supporting Evidence
It is seen that as per proviso to Rule 5 of Appendix VII, if the court mentioned in certificate is higher that the fee prescribed by rules only such fee shall be entered.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the petition is partly allowed. It is directed to correct the memo by noting commissioner batta actually paid as mentioned in the petition.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.T. Kuruvila
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chenchery Kurumkolam Residents Association
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Rajendra Babu
Relation
President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venugopal. S
Relation
Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Kumar. R
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.C. Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The petition is partly allowed regarding the advocate fee and the correction of the memo.
Evidence:
Petition is partly allowed vide separate order.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The claim of Advocate fee exceeding the amount received in the rules is disallowed.
Evidence:
The claim of Advocate fee exceeding the amount received in the rules is hereby disallowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.T. Kuruvila vs Chenchery Kurumkolam Residents Association et al regarding Advocate fee claim
Case Code Year
Case between K.T. Kuruvila vs Chenchery Kurumkolam Residents Association et al regarding Advocate fee claim

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won