Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 764/2018

Case between Krishnan et al vs Sasi et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 08/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit where the plaintiffs, including Krishnan, Binu, and Kumari, are against the defendants, Sasi and Manoharan. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence despite being directed to appear. The judgment was pronounced in open court on the same day.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence despite being directed to appear. The judgment was pronounced in open court on the same day.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court as required, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent contesting the matter. Plaintiff not present despite specific directions to appear before the Court.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Krishnan
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Binu
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kumari
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasi
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manoharan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Vasudevan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.A. Ahamed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.C. Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishnan et al vs Sasi et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Krishnan et al vs Sasi et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 08/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won