Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.533/2024

Case between K.P.Krishnakumar et al vs Vinod et al regarding suit dismissal due to absence.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-08-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K.P.Krishnakumar and others, initiated a suit against the defendants, led by Vinod and others, regarding a dispute related to the Asset Legacy Owners Association. The case was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were absent during the court proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs were absent during the court proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs' absence led to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

As plaintiff absent, and no representation made, suit stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.P.Krishnakumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.Sreekumar
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Asha.S.kumar
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinod
Party Age
61
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sangeetha Rajesh
Party Age
46
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vikanth
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhakrishnan
Party Age
63
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreekumar
Party Age
57
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Pachalloor.R.Jayakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit stood dismissed due to absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
As plaintiff absent, and no representation made, suit stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.P.Krishnakumar et al vs Vinod et al regarding suit dismissal due to absence.
Case Code Year
Case between K.P.Krishnakumar et al vs Vinod et al regarding suit dismissal due to absence.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won