Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. 23/2022

Case between Kizhakkayil Mariyam vs K. K. Abdul Hameed et al regarding eviction of tenants

Court
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-I, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Savitha. T.P
Order Date
2025-07-18
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months
Case Code No.
23
Case Closed
Fri, 07/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kizhakkayil Mariyam filed petitions against K. K. Abdul Hameed and Shereena to reclaim leased properties for her daughter's business after claims of non-payment of rent and property damage. The respondents contested the petitions citing maintainability and their own business needs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petitions were allowed, and the respondents were ordered to vacate the leased properties and surrender possession within one month.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the rooms and costs of the proceedings
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petitions were allowed, and the respondents were ordered to vacate the leased properties and surrender possession within one month.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated a bonafide need for the properties and established that the respondents illegally altered the premises, reducing its value.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the petitioner remains unchallenged. Hence the petitioner is entitled to get vacant possession of the petition schedule rooms.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, RCP 23/22 the petition is allowed u/s.11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act. The respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the room within one month from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kizhakkayil Mariyam
Party Age
66
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. K. Abdul Hameed
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shereena
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer Notice in RCP. 23/2022, Copy of Lawyer Notice in RCP. 24/2022, Reply Lawyer Notice in RCP. 23/2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Janil John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.M. Musthafa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Neena. V.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed u/s.11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act.
Evidence:
The respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the room within one month from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed u/s.11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act.
Evidence:
The respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the room within one month from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is entitled to get costs of this proceedings.
Evidence:
Petitioner is entitled to get costs of this proceedings.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is entitled to get costs of this proceedings.
Evidence:
Petitioner is entitled to get costs of this proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Lawyer Notice in RCP. 23/2022
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal Receipt in RCP. 23/2022
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment Card in RCP. 23/2022
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Lawyer Notice in RCP. 24/2022
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal Receipt in RCP. 24/2022
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment Card in RCP. 24/2022
Reference:
Ext.A2(b)
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Reply Lawyer Notice in RCP. 23/2022
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Advocate Commissioners Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Advocate Commissioners Sketch
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Notice of Inspection
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Notice of Inspection
Reference:
Ext.C1(b)

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between C.Jayaraj Panicker et al vs M.P.Mujeeb Rahman regarding eviction and rent arrears
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devasya vs V. K.Sasi regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction from shop rooms
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Sabira et al vs Hashim Thangal regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction.
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won