Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.286/2023

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Pradeep S et al regarding rejection of plaint

Court
COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-02-06
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Kerala Gramin Bank, represented by its manager Libin Thomas, filed a suit against Pradeep S and Kumari Maya S. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of balance court fee despite being given a last chance.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee after a final chance was granted. The case could not proceed further as a result.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee after a final chance was granted. The case could not proceed further as a result.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-compliance with court fee payment.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-compliance with court fee payment.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-compliance with court fee payment.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep S
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kumari Maya S
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Gayathri R Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kanjiramattom T K Siraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Rejection of the plaint due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Pradeep S et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Pradeep S et al regarding rejection of plaint

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won