Case Summary
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Ardra. V. S and others. The plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not appear for the hearing and no evidence was presented.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear and present evidence.
Plaintiff failed to appear and present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and no evidence was adduced.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kerala Gramin Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ardra. V. S
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Velayudhan. K
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sathianath
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Balachandran. C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. C. Mithran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.AnilKumar. M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Pramarajan. N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ardra. V. S et al regarding suit dismissed for default
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ardra. V. S et al regarding suit dismissed for default