Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.108/2023

Case between K.B.Unnikrishnan vs Sujitha et al regarding plaint rejection

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-07-15
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 07/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.B.Unnikrishnan filed a suit against Sujitha and others. The court dismissed the plaint due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to failure to remit the required court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to failure to remit the required court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Plaint was dismissed for non-compliance with court directions regarding court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaint was dismissed for non-compliance with court directions regarding court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Both sides represented. No balance court fee remitted even after giving repeated direction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of the Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.B.Unnikrishnan
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujitha
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subitha
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathish
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mahesh Subramonia Iyer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Sunny.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Prem Hari Das
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anagha Joy.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Shoby Joseph.Y
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected for failure to remit balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of the Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.B.Unnikrishnan vs Sujitha et al regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between K.B.Unnikrishnan vs Sujitha et al regarding plaint rejection

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 07/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won