Case Summary
The case involves Kammalatt Jeeja as the plaintiff and Kizhakkevattoli Gouthaman as the defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the final hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during the final hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not present. Legal aid counsel for the plaintiff reported no instruction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kammalatt Jeeja
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kizhakkevattoli Gouthaman
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sreeraj P.N.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sreejith Cherotte
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kammalatt Jeeja vs Kizhakkevattoli Gouthaman regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Kammalatt Jeeja vs Kizhakkevattoli Gouthaman regarding suit dismissal for default