Case Summary
Kala is the plaintiff in this case against the State of Kerala and two other defendants. The case was dismissed for default as both sides were absent and no representation was made before the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of both parties and lack of evidence presented.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
Supporting Evidence
No representation was made before the court.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kala
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala
- Relation
- represented by its Secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asst. Engineer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thajudeen
- Party Age
- 60
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. D Vijaya Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N. Benser (Addl. Govt.Pleader)
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to both parties being absent and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Case stands posted for evidence. Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kala vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissed for default
Case Code Year
Case between Kala vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissed for default