Case Summary
This case involves a review petition filed by the defendants seeking to review an order regarding the filing of a commission report. The defendants claimed they were unable to file an objection due to medical reasons, while the plaintiffs denied the allegations and sought dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the review petition filed by the defendants, finding merit in their medical reasons for not filing the objection in time. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The medical reasons provided by the defendants for not filing the objection in time were considered valid, and the court did not find any error apparent on the face of the record.
The medical reasons provided by the defendants for not filing the objection in time were considered valid, and the court did not find any error apparent on the face of the record.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The medical reasons provided by the defendants for not filing the objection in time were considered valid, and the court did not find any error apparent on the face of the record.
The medical reasons provided by the defendants for not filing the objection in time were considered valid, and the court did not find any error apparent on the face of the record.
Supporting Evidence
Hence, satisfying the reason stated in the review petition, the petition is liable to be allowed. Hence point No.1 is found in favour of the petitioners.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K. Sreekumaran Nair
- Party Age
- 78
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sivakumar.M
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sanal Kumar. M
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Simi.U
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G. Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Lekshmi Ramakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. Madhusoodhanan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B. Vasudevan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The review petition is allowed.
Evidence:
Hence, satisfying the reason stated in the review petition, the petition is liable to be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020