Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1525/2025

Case between Jyothi Premkumar et al vs Udarasiromony Road Resident’s Association et al regarding election dispute

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-12-10
Duration
Case Code No.
1525
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Jyothi Premkumar and others as petitioners against the Udarasiromony Road Resident’s Association and others regarding the legality of elections held by the Association. The petitioners claim misappropriation of funds and sought an injunction to prevent the new committee from operating Association accounts.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition seeking a direction to prevent the operation of the Residents Association's account, finding no sufficient reason to grant the relief due to potential harm to the Association's functioning.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition seeking a direction to prevent the operation of the Residents Association's account, finding no sufficient reason to grant the relief due to potential harm to the Association's functioning.
Key Reasoning:
The relief sought was not granted as the court found no sufficient reason to interfere with the functioning of the association.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is no justification for granting the relief sought in the present petition.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jyothi Premkumar
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Deepa B. Roy
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Udarasiromony Road Resident’s Association
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anasuya @ Anasuya Shaji
Party Age
74
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Kumar. G
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Jayadevan
Party Age
67
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Datha Sunil, alias Ansel. T. Alex
Party Age
52
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Nalanchira K.S. Satheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Paraniyam R.T. Devakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Direction to restrain the respondents from conducting the election and to maintain the existing Committee until 31.07.2027.
Evidence:
However, this relief was not granted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Misappropriation of funds
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Residents Association

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won