Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.1586/2012

Case between Jyothi Kumar vs Indira.S.Nair, Meena.A.V. regarding review of order in IA 8/23

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jyothi Kumar filed a review petition regarding an earlier order permitting the defendants to engage an advocate commissioner for a will. The defendants countered that the review lacks merit and is barred by the law of limitation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The review petition filed by Jyothi Kumar was dismissed by the court. The court found no error apparent on the record to justify a review of the prior decision.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The review petition filed by Jyothi Kumar was dismissed by the court. The court found no error apparent on the record to justify a review of the prior decision.
Key Reasoning:
The review petition lacked merit and was barred by the law of limitation.
Why Defendant Won:
The review petition lacked merit and was barred by the law of limitation.
Supporting Evidence
The contention of the petitioner is that there is error apparent on face of record. However, no such error is pointed out by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jyothi Kumar
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Indira.S.Nair
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Meena.A.V.
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Arun.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.A. Abdul Kharim (CP2)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The review petition is liable to be dismissed.
Evidence:
In the light of aforesaid discussions, this court is of the view that the petition is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jyothi Kumar vs Indira.S.Nair, Meena.A.V. regarding review of order in IA 8/23
Case Code Year
Case between Jyothi Kumar vs Indira.S.Nair, Meena.A.V. regarding review of order in IA 8/23

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won