Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 292/ 2025

Case between Jesna Ansari vs Muhammed Nahas et al regarding injunction against encroachment.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-08-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jesna Ansari is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Muhammed Nahas and others. The case deals with preventing encroachment on the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching on the property until further notice.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction against encroachment.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching on the property until further notice.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was established by the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case was established by the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the plaint, affidavit and documents produced. I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule property and committing any act of waste therein until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jesna Ansari
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Nahas
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nazeer
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nizar
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thajunisa
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Seema
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Thajudheen Ahammmed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. A. Ramees Beevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule property and committing any act of waste therein
Evidence:
Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule property and committing any act of waste therein until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jesna Ansari vs Muhammed Nahas et al regarding injunction against encroachment.
Case Code Year
Case between Jesna Ansari vs Muhammed Nahas et al regarding injunction against encroachment.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won