Case Summary
The plaintiff, Jayasree, was absent during the hearings and did not represent herself, while the defendant, Anithakumari.S, was present. The court decided to dismiss the case due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear or represent her case, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff did not appear or represent her case, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear or represent her case, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff did not appear or represent her case, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was continuously absent on previous postings.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence I find no reasons to proceed with this suit. Hence suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayasree.
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anithakumari.S
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.I.Shah
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.S.Ratheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's suit has been dismissed due to their continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence I find no reasons to proceed with this suit. Hence suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayasree vs Anithakumari.S regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Jayasree vs Anithakumari.S regarding dismissal of suit.