Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.712/2020

Case between Jayanthi kumari vs Rajendran Nair et al regarding settlement of dispute.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
approximately-4 years 6 months
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Jayanthi kumari as the plaintiff against Rajendran Nair and others as defendants. The matter was settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The matter was adjudicated in court, and it was settled in terms of mediation. The judgment ordered that the suit be decreed in accordance with the mediation report.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The matter was adjudicated in court, and it was settled in terms of mediation. The judgment ordered that the suit be decreed in accordance with the mediation report.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was lawfully settled through mediation, as stated in the judgment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was lawfully settled through mediation, as stated in the judgment.
Supporting Evidence
Mediation report received. Matter settled in mediation terms lawful. Signed by both parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in terms of mediation Report it shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayanthi kumari
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajendran Nair
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balachandran Nair
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lathika kumari
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girija kumari
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sree Rekha
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mridul John Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sreebhadran.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Jithin.V.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Srinivasan Venugopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation report
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of mediation Report it shall form part of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayanthi kumari vs Rajendran Nair et al regarding settlement of dispute.
Case Code Year
Case between Jayanthi kumari vs Rajendran Nair et al regarding settlement of dispute.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 07/27/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won