Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 1590/2022

Case between Jai Ganesh vs Rajeswari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S, Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
approximately-2 years 8 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jai Ganesh, a Non-Resident Indian, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against his sister Rajeswari and her husband V. Subash due to ongoing harassment and attempts to illegally acquire parental property after their parents' demise. The court hears the case ex-parte as the defendants did not appear.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from entering the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual restraint from entering the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from entering the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established lawful ownership and peaceful possession of the property, demonstrating ongoing harassment and unlawful acts by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established lawful ownership and peaceful possession of the property, demonstrating ongoing harassment and unlawful acts by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The court finds that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case by demonstrating lawful ownership and peaceful possession of the plaint schedule property along with his wife and minor child.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) Let the defendants 1 and 2 and their agents be perpetually restrained from entering the plaint schedule property or committing any acts, that may interfere with or hamper the peaceful enjoyment and possession of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff and his family.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jai Ganesh
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aswathy. S.R
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeswari
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. Subash
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Sale Deed No. 4496/2007, Digital copy of the building tax receipt, Digital copy of the land tax receipt, Original Power of Attorney
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anithas Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun Chandran A. K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Gayathri. S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Govinda B.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kiran Kumar. S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Varsha. B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent injunction against the defendants from entering the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Let the defendants 1 and 2 and their agents be perpetually restrained from entering the plaint schedule property or committing any acts, that may interfere with or hamper the peaceful enjoyment and possession of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff and his family.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Sale Deed proving plaintiff's lawful ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Digital copy of the building tax receipt in the name of the plaintiff, supporting his claim of property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Digital copy of the land tax receipt related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Power of Attorney allowing Aswathy S.R to represent the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jai Ganesh vs Rajeswari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jai Ganesh vs Rajeswari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 11/29/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won