OS.No.1375 /2018

Case between J. Yovel vs J. Johns et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court

COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S

Order Date

2025-04-02

Duration

Case Code No.

1375

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, J. Yovel, is involved in a case against multiple defendants including J. Johns and others. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the court hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence, indicating a failure to present evidence.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal.

Supporting Evidence

Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the plaintiff is not present before the court to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: J. Yovel
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: J. Johns
Party Age: 53
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M. Shyla
Party Age: 45
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sheela Florence
Party Age: 58
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Praveen. R.S
Party Age: 32
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jasmine. P
Party Age: 28
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Jayakrishnan. D
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Renoj. S
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Vattappara V. Sajan Prasad
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. M. Thulasidas
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The suit is dismissed for default.

Evidence: