Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1444/2021

Case between Ivy Edwin et al vs Padmakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-05-29
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 05/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Ivy Edwin and Mareena Sunil, who filed a suit against Padmakumar and the Secretary of the Peringammala Labour Contract Co-operative Society. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiffs did not appear and failed to provide representation. As a result, there was no evidence presented in support of their claims.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiffs did not appear and failed to provide representation. As a result, there was no evidence presented in support of their claims.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to appear or represent their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent no representation. Suit stands posted for exparte evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ivy Edwin
Party Age
82
Relation
W/o Edwin
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mareena Sunil
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o Ivy Edwin
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Padmakumar
Relation
Secretary, Peringammala Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited No.T1640
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary
Relation
Peringammala Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited No. T 1640
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.Vikraman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.Dinesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Midhun A. Satheesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Gautham.S.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Govind.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Kamaleswaram S. Manikantan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Vaishakh.M.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit stands dismissed due to absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is absent and no representation is made, Suit stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ivy Edwin et al vs Padmakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Ivy Edwin et al vs Padmakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 05/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won