Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P.No.26/2017

Case between International Rubber Works et al vs Coromandal Clays et al regarding compromise petition

Court
Court of Rent Control
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
Case Code No.
26
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a compromise petition between the petitioners and counter petitioners. The matter in dispute was settled involving an area of land being allotted to both parties as per the agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition in terms of a compromise agreement between the parties. The area of land in dispute has been settled as per the agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition in terms of a compromise agreement between the parties. The area of land in dispute has been settled as per the agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of compromise petition, it is revealed that matter in dispute between the parties was settled and order already passed by director of industries and commerce.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is allowed in terms of compromise agreement. The compromise agreement shall form part of the order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
International Rubber Works
Relation
represented by its Managing Partner
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.A. Phaisal
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ray Abraham Thomas
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M. Nageeb
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Coromandal Clays
Relation
represented by its Managing Partner
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.J. Faisal
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Majeed Abdulla
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Harish Rahman Padiath
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Kowdiar S Mohandas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mridul John Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Laxmi. S.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Kulathoor S.V Premakumaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence petition is allowed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between B.Vijayan vs Shabnam Aslam regarding petition dismissal
IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nisha vs P.Ramesan regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Noorul Islamic Educational Trust(NIET) vs M/s Acumen Global Private Limited et al regarding a petition.
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Barbara Thomas vs Sonia Benny regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won