Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.2159/2023

Case between Indiradevi.S vs Hemasree.S et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
Case Code No.
2159
Case Closed
Wed, 08/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Indiradevi.S filed a suit against defendants Hemasree.S, A.Syamaladevi, and Ragini. The case concluded with a mediation settlement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit has been decreed in terms of the mediation agreement, which shall form part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed in terms of the mediation agreement, which shall form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement. The mediation agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indiradevi.S
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hemasree.S
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.Syamaladevi
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ragini
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G.S. Sanal Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.K.Chandrika
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Chandra Mohan Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Anil Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreena.L.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Baaji Raveendran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Mediation report received stating “settled”. Hence suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 08/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won