Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.320/2020

Case between Indiara Nair et al vs N. Mahesh regarding Default Dismissal

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-07
Duration
approximately-5 years
Case Closed
Mon, 07/07/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Indiara Nair, Meerakumar, and Remy Nandakumar against defendant N. Mahesh. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs to adduce evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs, preventing them from adducing evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs, preventing them from adducing evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs did not appear to present their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs are absent before the court to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indiara Nair
Party Age
79
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Meerakumar
Party Age
47
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Remy Nandakumar
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N. Mahesh
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R. Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mahesh Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Muralidharan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Jaideep G Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiffs are absent before the court to adduce evidence and the prayed for filing amendment application implies that, the plaintiff is not ready to adduce evidence before the court. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Indiara Nair et al vs N. Mahesh regarding Default Dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Indiara Nair et al vs N. Mahesh regarding Default Dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 07/07/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/07/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won