Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by the University of Kerala and its engineer as defendants against Immunisa Beegum and others who are the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs seek a permanent prohibitory injunction and the defendants are attempting to introduce certain documents as evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the defendants' petition to accept and mark certain documents as evidence, finding them necessary for their case.
Key Reasoning:
The documents produced by the defendants were deemed necessary for proving their case.
The documents produced by the defendants were deemed necessary for proving their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The evidence cannot be shut down without giving an opportunity to adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Immunisa Beegum
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radhakutty Amma
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radhamony
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- University of Kerala
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Engineer, University of Kerala
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Documents produced by the first defendant
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V.K.Radhakrishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.R.Anandakuttan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition to receive and mark the documents produced by the defendants was allowed.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is liable to be allowed and the documents produced by the defendants are accepted and to be marked as sought for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Type of document (e.g. Title Deed, Tax Receipt, Commissioner Report)
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
The documents produced by the defendants are accepted as necessary for proving their case and disproving the claims made by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.B17 and Ext.B18 series
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Documents produced by defendant are necessary to support their case
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2007