Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.88/2024

Case between Ida alias Ida Kalist vs Brijit regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-01-29
Duration
approximately-1 year 12 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ida alias Ida Kalist is the plaintiff who seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against Brijit, the defendant, regarding the usage of a pathway. The plaintiff claims to have uninterrupted possession of the pathway for the last 50 years.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, granting the permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prevent any trespassing or blockage of the pathway. The plaintiff is also awarded costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction preventing the defendant from trespassing or blocking the pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, granting the permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prevent any trespassing or blockage of the pathway. The plaintiff is also awarded costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved uninterrupted and exclusive possession of the pathway for over 50 years.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved uninterrupted and exclusive possession of the pathway for over 50 years.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of plaintiff remains unchallenged. There is no reason to disbelieve PW1. Their is no contra evidence on record. From the available evidence, the plaintiff is entitled for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint C schedule pathway or blocking the C schedule pathway.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: (i) The defendants are restrained from trespassing into the plaint C schedule pathway or blocking the C schedule pathway or harass the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint C schedule pathway or demolishing the existing western boundary of C schedule pathway or committing any waste in the plaint C schedule pathway. (ii) Considering the facts and circumstances, the plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ida alias Ida Kalist
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Brijit
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Kudikidappu Application, Certified copy of Certificate from Village Office, Pettah, Copy of Electricity Bill, Rough Sketch, Copy of Aadhar card, Copy of Ration card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Francis Gomez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are restrained from trespassing into the plaint C schedule pathway or blocking the pathway.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: (i) The defendants are restrained from trespassing into the plaint C schedule pathway or blocking the C schedule pathway or harass the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint C schedule pathway.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Kudikidappu Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted to demonstrate the plaintiff's application for kudikidappu rights over the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certificate from Village Office
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certified copy supports the plaintiff's claims regarding possession.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Electricity Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is used to establish the plaintiff's residence and utility usage.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This sketch illustrates the layout of the plaint A schedule property and the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Aadhar Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the identity of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Ration Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further establishes the plaintiff's identity and residency.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report describes the condition and access of the plaint C schedule pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Mahazar
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document supplements the commission report with additional details.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ida alias Ida Kalist vs Brijit regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ida alias Ida Kalist vs Brijit regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won