Case Summary
ICICI Bank Ltd filed a suit against Anoop.G. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing and the case was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation being made despite repeated directions.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- ICICI Bank Ltd
- Relation
- represented by its Manager and Power of Attorney Holder Prsanth.M
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anoop.G
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Biju kumar pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Devi Gopa kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between ICICI Bank Ltd vs Anoop.G regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between ICICI Bank Ltd vs Anoop.G regarding dismissal for default