Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1024/2024

Case between ICICI Bank Limited vs Sreenivasulu P regarding default dismissal

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
Case Code No.
1024
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves ICICI Bank Limited as the plaintiff and Sreenivasulu P as the defendant. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation. The suit was dismissed for default as no further steps were taken to correct the situation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation. The suit was dismissed for default as no further steps were taken to correct the situation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiff was absent and no fresh steps seen taken or defect seen cured.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
ICICI Bank Limited
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreenivasulu P
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Bijukumar Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Devi Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won