Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 38/2025

Case between Hariram vs Ramachandran, Sreejith regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Hariram filed a petition against Ramachandran and Sreejith for an interim injunction. The court assessed the prima facie case and potential harm if no order was granted.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from encroaching into the property. This decision was based on the assessment of potential irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction restraining defendants from encroaching into the petition schedule property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from encroaching into the property. This decision was based on the assessment of potential irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that a prima facie case was established and that irreparable injury would occur without an injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the very purpose of the suit. If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and cutting open a new pathway through petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste in the petition schedule property until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hariram
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramachandran
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreejith
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. SMART
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and cutting open a new pathway through petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste in the petition schedule property until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hariram vs Ramachandran, Sreejith regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Hariram vs Ramachandran, Sreejith regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won