Case Summary
The Decree Holders led by Haridasan are executing a prior decree against the Judgment Debtors, which include Raveendran and others. The court has confirmed that the decree is satisfied.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court acknowledged that the decree has been satisfied. The execution petition was thereby closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree was found to be satisfied by the Decree Holder.
The decree was found to be satisfied by the Decree Holder.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree was found to be satisfied by the Decree Holder.
The decree was found to be satisfied by the Decree Holder.
Supporting Evidence
It was submitted by the Decree Holder that decree is satisfied.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, Execution petition is closed as satisfied.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haridasan
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jalaja
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Harilal
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haribal
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raveendran
- Party Age
- 78
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayanthi
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramani
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Girija
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
None
Defendants Documents
None
Advocates
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Nellimmoodu Udayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Judgment Debtor
- Advocate Name
- Smt Chandralekha. S.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Execution petition is closed as satisfied.
Evidence:
It was submitted by the Decree Holder that decree is satisfied. Hence, Execution petition is closed as satisfied.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court received a commission report which informed the decision.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haridasan et al vs Raveendran et al regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Haridasan et al vs Raveendran et al regarding Execution Petition