Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P.No.40/2023

Case between H. Anantharamakrishnan vs K. Raveendran Nair regarding possession of Petition Scheduled Building.

Court
Rent Control Court
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-08-22
Duration
Case Code No.
40
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

H. Anantharamakrishnan is the petitioner seeking possession of a shop room. K. Raveendran Nair is the counter petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the scheduled building.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of the Petition Scheduled Building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the scheduled building.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner is entitled to possession as the respondent failed to furnish any explanation or appeal.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No explanation seen furnished by the respondent. No review petition or intimation of appeal of revision received. No payment seen made.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the further proceedings in RCP is here by stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of Petition Scheduled Building U/S 12(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Control)act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
H. Anantharamakrishnan
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Raveendran Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Vinoj.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Ajith A.N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of Petition Scheduled Building.
Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is here by stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of Petition Scheduled Building U/S 12(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Control) act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between B.Vijayan vs Shabnam Aslam regarding petition dismissal
IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nisha vs P.Ramesan regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Noorul Islamic Educational Trust(NIET) vs M/s Acumen Global Private Limited et al regarding a petition.
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Barbara Thomas vs Sonia Benny regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won