Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1822/2016

Case between Gopalakrishnan et al vs Sivasankaran Nair regarding a petition in IA.No.8/2025

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-08-18
Duration
approximately-8 years 3 months
Case Code No.
1822
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by Gopalakrishnan and others against Sivasankaran Nair. The court heard the petition and allowed it for further examination of the matters in dispute.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for further proceedings and appointed an advocate commissioner to ascertain matters in dispute.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for further proceedings and appointed an advocate commissioner to ascertain matters in dispute.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient cause for allowing the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient cause for allowing the petition.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that there is sufficient cause for allowing the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the petition and for elucidating the matters in disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nirmala George Stephen
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jaya.O
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Omana
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sivasankaran Nair
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.G.Joseprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Sreebhadran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Vishnu Hari R.
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
For ascertaining the matters in the petition and for elucidating the matters in disputes between the parties.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that there is sufficient cause for allowing the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 05/18/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won